The Price of Consumption and Worth of Creation

Why Getting What You Want Makes You Happy for 5 Minutes, but Creating Something Lasts

Consumption is detrimental to us in ways we rarely stop to consider. It numbs us, distracts us, and keeps us from what we truly want to do in life. Having lived in Western Europe most of my life, I never questioned why I always felt the need for more – more things, more experiences, more external validation. I was trapped in affluence, yet something was always missing.

I eventually left Western Europe in search of a more minimalistic and meaningful life. I let go of the constant pursuit of consumption, security, and status, and instead embraced a lifestyle aligned with my values and inner compass. My goal was to build a life I didn’t need to escape from, where activity and creation played a central role. Instead of chasing external factors and conforming to group dynamics, I wanted to follow the flow of life and reconnect with nature.

Moving to Poland was eye-opening, though not without resistance and criticism. Here, life felt more natural, more centered around family. I realized that not every external need had to be satisfied. Life happened in the safe space of the family, where not everything on the outside required a response. There was a sense of contentment that didn’t rely on constant consumption.

Years ago, I read a book by Osho in which he explored why the Western world struggles with mental health issues. He pointed out that people in the West often lack real challenges. Our minds are designed to solve problems, to face difficulties and overcome them. When these challenges do not exist on a material level, we create problems just to have something to solve.

In contrast, in many Eastern cultures, people often have little materially but everything to hope for. I especially noticed this while living in Israel, where life is undeniably difficult, yet there is a deep sense of connection and shared experience. I have never met as many creators as I did there – people who not only engage in artistic expression but also create for themselves and for others on a daily basis.

How Creation and Consumption Have Shifted Over the Last 50 Years

The balance between creation and consumption has changed dramatically over the last five decades, driven by technological advancements, economic shifts, and evolving cultural norms.

1970s–1980s: Creation in the Physical World

People engaged more in hands-on activities, building, crafting, and embracing a strong DIY culture. Home cooking, repairing items, and making music or art were integral to everyday life rather than occasional hobbies. Media consumption was limited to television, radio, and books, with fewer choices but deeper engagement.

1990s–2000s: The Rise of Mass Consumerism and Digital Consumption

Globalization made mass-produced goods more accessible, accelerating consumer culture. Cable TV, video games, and later the internet introduced 24/7 entertainment, increasing passive consumption. Creative outlets like photography and music became digitized but were still largely controlled by professionals.

2010s: The Social Media Boom and Passive Creation

Platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok gave individuals the ability to create, but much of this “creation” became tied to algorithms and external validation. Streaming services and social media made consumption hyper-personalized and addictive, shifting focus from deep engagement to endless scrolling. DIY culture resurfaced with platforms like Etsy, but mass consumer culture still dominated.

2020s: AI, Automation, and the Consumption Overload

AI-generated content, automation, and recommendation algorithms have made passive consumption effortless and overwhelming. Many people consume far more than they create, with shorter attention spans and a focus on instant gratification. The digital economy has made true creativity harder, as most content is optimized for virality rather than depth.

Where Are We Headed?

The challenge now is finding balance – leveraging technology for meaningful creation rather than being trapped in passive consumption cycles. There is a growing movement of people rejecting overconsumption in favor of craftsmanship, long-form content, and intentional living.

Scientific studies have shown that people who engage in physical work and express their creativity experience greater happiness than those who primarily consume. It is concerning that we now need to take deliberate breaks from the online world to reconnect with reality. The fact that we must escape into the real world rather than naturally live in it is alarming.

In my own life, my job requires a lot of analytical thinking and structure, which brings me into my masculine energy. To balance this, I turn to dance, writing, sewing, and cooking – practical activities that not only make me feel good but also result in tangible, meaningful outcomes.

Each expression of life is a creation. The more we embrace it, the less we need to consume.

The Age of Aquarius

Between Hyper-Independence and Human Needs

We are living in unprecedented times – a millennial shift that redefines humanity’s trajectory. The technological advancements of the past century have catapulted us into an era of transformation that feels like a 1,000-year leap forward. It’s awe-inspiring yet daunting to grasp the pace of change around us.

Technology: Connecting and Isolating Us

Predicting what our work life will look like in a decade feels impossible. What’s clear, however, is that technology both connects and isolates us. According to a report, the average person now spends over 6 hours daily online, with 3 hours on their phone alone. Last week, I discovered I was spending the same amount of time – nearly 19% of my waking hours – scrolling, texting, and watching, much of it on distractions or maintaining a digital avatar.

This constant online presence creates a false sense of connection. Seeing people online tricks us into believing we’re close, but in reality, it often keeps relationships at a safe, emotional distance. For someone like me, who has always embraced hyper-independence, this digital closeness feels convenient. It supports my need for self-sufficiency and reinforces a belief that I can function entirely on my own. But is this truly sustainable?

Hyper-Independence: A Double-Edged Sword

Hyper-independence, often celebrated as strength, can mask deeper wounds. Research suggests that one-third of adults in Western societies identify as self-reliant to the point of avoiding vulnerability. While these traits make individuals adaptable and highly functional in workplaces where emotional regulation is key, it’s worth noting that humans are biologically wired for connection.

What I once saw as a badge of honor – handling everything on my own – I now recognize as a trauma response. We may thrive in environments that value independence, but suppressing the need for human connection ultimately leaves us depleted.

Our Soul’s Cry for Rest

In our “busy is better” culture, we’ve normalized an unsustainable pace of life. Today, the average person processes five times more information daily than someone in the 1980s, and the mental load can lead to chronic stress, burnout, and emotional numbing. No wonder studies show that 85% of people worldwide feel emotionally disengaged.

Downtime isn’t a luxury; it’s a necessity. Just as we need food and sleep, we need moments of stillness to recalibrate. I’ve found that dedicating one full day a week to rest allows me to recharge and maintain my emotional well-being. Without it, I’d risk losing touch with myself in the endless stream of notifications and to-do lists.

The Soul and Technology: An Uneasy Relationship

The rise of AI and advanced technologies has only deepened the tension between connection and isolation. People are increasingly turning to AI not just for practical advice but for existential guidance. Instead of looking inward, we seek answers externally, relying on technology to fill emotional voids.

What we forget is that each of us carries an innate intelligence – call it intuition, consciousness, or soul-level awareness. But tapping into it requires courage and stillness, something we’re losing in the digital age.

Staying Grounded Amid Rapid Change

As technology propels us forward, staying grounded becomes more challenging yet more essential. Personally, I’ve found solace in rituals – small, meaningful practices that reconnect me to my center. Whether it’s journaling, mindful walks, or simply disconnecting from screens, these routines help anchor me amid life’s whirlwind.

Interestingly, this rapid pace of change often makes life feel longer. More jobs, more cities, more relationships – our lives are now packed with experiences that previous generations would spread across decades. While exciting, this acceleration forces us to develop tools to stay connected to our humanity.

The Future: Humanity or Machine?

We stand at a crossroads. As technology becomes inseparable from our daily lives, humanity faces a divide: between those who embrace the metaverse and those who seek higher consciousness. This isn’t just a philosophical shift – it’s a practical one. The future may hold a union between soul and technology, allowing us to live more authentically through innovation.

However, the mind alone cannot lead us there. Historically, the mind has been a flawed guide – prone to ego, insecurities, and avoidance of pain. If we fail to lead with emotional courage and open-heartedness, we risk becoming like the very robots we’re building.

Closing Thoughts: Welcoming the New

The structures of the past are crumbling, making way for something entirely new. Whether this shift elevates humanity or diminishes it will depend on our ability to balance technological advancement with emotional and spiritual growth. Perhaps in 50 years, we’ll find ways to connect our essence with technology, allowing us to thrive in a way that honors both our humanity and innovation.

Until then, the choice is ours: Will we let technology guide us, or will we use it as a tool to amplify our deeper, truer selves?

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑